Red meat and type 2 diabetes have been linked for years, but nobody has pinned down why. A French research team now has a suspect with an unusual résumé: a sugar humans cannot make themselves but can absorb from the food on their plate.
Early results from a study of nearly 90,000 adults, presented at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes meeting in Milan, tie higher intake of that sugar to a noticeably higher chance of developing the disease.
Even so, the details deserve a close read, and several cut against the tidy headline. Body weight, dairy and a single statistical adjustment all complicate the story, and the molecule at its center has a stranger research history than most nutrition headlines can claim.
What The French Data Showed
The headline figure comes from comparing the biggest and smallest consumers of one specific molecule.
The sugar is N-glycolylneuraminic acid, or Neu5Gc. The study followed 89,953 adults from France’s NutriNet-Santé cohort, about 79% of them women, with an average age of 42. None had diabetes or cancer at the start.
Participants kept three 24-hour food records, and the team used a database of measured Neu5Gc levels in foods to estimate each person’s intake. Hence, the figures are estimates rather than readings from anyone’s blood or tissue. The red meat category covered beef, lamb, pork, rabbit, goat and game, with processed meats tracked separately.
Over a median of 7.2 years, 966 people developed type 2 diabetes. Adults in the top fifth for meat-derived Neu5Gc had a 63% higher risk than those in the bottom fifth, after adjustment for age, sex, physical activity, diet quality, smoking and underlying health conditions.
Why 63% Sounds Bigger Than It Is
The researchers themselves flagged how easily that percentage gets misread.
Fezeu said the figure is a relative risk. “It does not mean that 63% of high consumers will develop diabetes.” Diabetes stayed fairly uncommon over the follow-up period, so the absolute-risk difference for any one person is much smaller than the percentage suggests.
The pattern also had a shape. Risk rose mainly in the top two groups, with the second-highest showing 41% higher risk, while the lower groups showed no significant difference from the bottom. The association appeared in both men and women, though the sex-specific numbers were too small to analyze separately.
In the top group, men ate a median of 97 grams of red meat a day, and women ate 73 grams. These describe what people ate, and the study sets no safe or harmful amount.
Related: The Surprising Superfoods That Boost Energy and Mood
A Theory With One Missing Piece
The proposed explanation starts with an immune system that may treat a food as foreign.
Most mammals make Neu5Gc. Humans lost that ability through an ancient mutation in a gene called CMAH, yet the molecule can still get in through beef, lamb, and, in smaller amounts, dairy. Researchers propose it becomes incorporated into tissue, where antibodies recognize it as foreign, and the resulting low-grade inflammation, called xenosialitis, could interfere with insulin action and the insulin-producing cells of the pancreas.
Parts of it have human evidence. In research reported in 2003, three UC San Diego scientists, Ajit Varki, Elaine Muchmore, and Pascal Gagneux, drank a pork-derived Neu5Gc solution to see whether people absorb it.
They retained only small amounts, with no immediate ill effects. A 2020 BMC Medicine study in the same French cohort later tied higher intake to higher anti-Neu5Gc antibody levels in 120 people, though it looked at antibodies, not diabetes.
Dairy And Cooking Add Wrinkles
Photo Credit: Ajafoto/Deposit Photos
Neu5Gc shows up in more foods than the “red meat sugar” label suggests.
Dairy-derived Neu5Gc showed no link to diabetes in the French data. When researchers combined Neu5Gc from all sources, the top fifth had a 37% higher risk than the bottom, largely driven by red meat. Fezeu said the results suggest the link may depend on the food source.
Dairy is harder to wave away than it sounds. The 2020 BMC Medicine work also measured foods and found the highest concentrations in sheep and goat dairy, moderate levels in red and processed meat, and low levels in cow dairy. Why meat and dairy behave differently remains an open question, and nothing here suggests goat cheese raises diabetes risk.
Cooking also does not appear to change the amount. An earlier PNAS analysis found that baking, boiling and frying did not significantly change Neu5Gc content in the meat samples tested.
What Scientists Want To Check Next
The to-do list runs from antibody tests to the meat itself.
The team plans to measure anti-Neu5Gc antibodies in large groups of people and to study Neu5Gc alongside haem iron. This study did not examine substitutions, and dietary guidelines already recommend limiting red meat for reasons beyond this one molecule.
One line of research is earlier still. A 2019 Nature Microbiology study identified bacterial enzymes that released Neu5Gc from beef and pork sausage in laboratory tests, an approach NIH described as a possible route to lowering exposure without giving up meat. It remains a laboratory result, with no proven effect on diabetes.
When a nutrition study comes with this many caveats, how much weight do you give it when deciding what goes on your plate?
More Articles You Might Be Interested in:
The post A Sugar in Red Meat May Help Explain Its Link to Diabetes, Early Study Finds appeared first on FODMAP Everyday.